The Allegiance

1 F. Cas. 431, 6 Sawy. 68, 1879 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68
District Court, D. Oregon·Decided October 29, 1879·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

DEAD!, District Judge.

A. D. Wass and George O. Flavel bring this suit against the British ship Allegiance upon a cause of salvage, civil and maritime, for salvage service rendered by them to said ship with the aid of the steam tugs Brenham, Astoria, and Columbia, and their officers and crews, on January 10 and 11, 1879, in and near the north channel of the Columbia river, between black buoy No. 5 and the east end of Sand island. Upon due process and proceedings the vessel was seized and appraised at forty-seven thousand dollars, and delivered to the owner, David Morgan, of Amglesea, Wales, upon a stipulation in the sum of thirty thousand dollars. The answer of the claimant denies that the service rendered to the Allegiance was a salvage service, and avers that it was only a towage service, worth not to exceed two hundred dollars. Afterwards, upon the stipulation of the libel-ants and claimant, A. M. Simpson, George Flavel, and A. D. Wass, as owners of the tugs, and E. Johnson, A. Malcolm, and D. M. McVicker, as part of the crew of the Brenham, were admitted to intervene herein as joint salvors with the libelants, and to become parties to the libel. The testimony is somewhat voluminous, and upon some material points conflicting. The master, mate, and two pilots of the Brenham, the master of the Astoria, the master of the light-house tender, the Shubrick, and of a merchant vessel, the McNear, were examined as witnesses by the libelants; and the master and two mates of the Allegiance, the master and two lieutenants and the boatswain and carpenter of the revenue cutter, the Corwin, for the claimant. Alter an extended examination of the testimony, and a careful comparison of the disputed points with the known circumstance of the channel, spits and tides of the locality, and after weighing well the intelligence, meins of knowledge, candor, and credibility of the witnesses, I find the material facts of the case to be as follows: On the evening of January 9, 1S79, the Allegiance, an iron ship of one thousand two hundred and thirty-five tons burden, two hundred and twelve feet in length, and drawing twelve feet of water, made the mouth of the Columbia river in ballast, on her way to this port". She stood off and on until morning, when getting pretty close to the breakers, and no pilot coming to her aid, she crossed the bar at a quarter past ten o’clock, with a fair, wind from the southwest, under her topsails, foresail, foretopmast staysail, and jib, and passed red buoy No. 2 on the starboard tack, about eleven o’clock, nearly one hundred and fifty yards to the eastward of the channel, with a whole-sail breeze from the south by east, her course being about northeast by east. The master of the Allegiance had never been in the Columbia river before, but the mate had once, and told the master, as an inducment to come in without a pilot, that they would certainly find the steam tug and pilot in Baker’s bay. At this time the tug Brenham was lying at anchor near the wharf at Fort Canby in Baker’s bay, well around the point of the cape, and the revenue cutter Corwin was at anchor in the same bay, about two hundred yards to the north-north-east of her. The officers of the tug had known from early morning that the Allegiance was outside the bar, but had not gone out to give her a pilot or a tow because of the roughness of the bar. When the Allegiance passed the red buoy No. 2 the [432] weather was getting thick, and she had not yet. made out the entrance to Baker’s bay, and the master probably thought. it was ahead of him in the direction in which he was sailing. Soon after the Allegiance passed the red buoy No. 2 she was sighted by the cutter, and it appearing to the master of the latter that the former was out of the channel, he gave the alarm by blowing his whistle. This attracted the attention of the Allegiance, and she at once commenced to shorten sail, luffed up to the wind, and checked her way, but drifted on before the wind and tide in a north-east direction. The tide was flood and lacked about two hours of high water. The current was running in at the rate of three or four miles an hour, while the wind had a velocity of about eight, and was increasing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Allegiance, 1 F. Cas. 431, 6 Sawy. 68, 1879 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68 (D. Or. 1879).

1 F. Cas. 431 (The Allegiance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

The Cape Race
18 F.2d 79 (Second Circuit, 1927)
Duff v. Merritt
86 F. 675 (Second Circuit, 1898)
Pederson v. John D. Spreckles & Bros.
87 F. 938 (Ninth Circuit, 1898)