Thayer v. Lombard

42 N.E. 563, 165 Mass. 174, 1896 Mass. LEXIS 208
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided January 4, 1896·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Field, C. J.

The dying declarations of the defendants’ testator were not admissible to prove the facts to which the declarations related. The facts in controversy were facts in the past, and not facts concerning the feelings or thoughts of the testator existing at the time the declarations were made. See Chapin v. Marlborough, 9 Gray, 244. The present case does not bring the declarations within any of the exceptions known to the common law where declarations of deceased persons are admitted in evidence. The admission of the declarations of a deceased person on the ground that they are dying declarations is by the common law confined to prosecutions for homicide, and there is no statute which makes them evidence in a civil action such as this is. 1 Greenl. Ev. § 156.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thayer v. Lombard, 42 N.E. 563, 165 Mass. 174, 1896 Mass. LEXIS 208 (Mass. 1896).

42 N.E. 563 (Thayer v. Lombard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Slavski
245 Mass. 405 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1923)
Ross v. Cooper
164 N.W. 679 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1916)
Commonwealth v. Turner
224 Mass. 229 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1916)
Nunnally v. Mail & Express Co.
113 A.D. 831 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906)