Thayer v. Lombard

42 N.E. 563, 165 Mass. 174, 1896 Mass. LEXIS 208
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedJanuary 4, 1896
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 42 N.E. 563 (Thayer v. Lombard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thayer v. Lombard, 42 N.E. 563, 165 Mass. 174, 1896 Mass. LEXIS 208 (Mass. 1896).

Opinion

Field, C. J.

The dying declarations of the defendants’ testator were not admissible to prove the facts to which the declarations related. The facts in controversy were facts in the past, and not facts concerning the feelings or thoughts of the testator existing at the time the declarations were made. See Chapin v. Marlborough, 9 Gray, 244. The present case does not bring the declarations within any of the exceptions known to the common law where declarations of deceased persons are admitted in evidence. The admission of the declarations of a deceased person on the ground that they are dying declarations is by the common law confined to prosecutions for homicide, and there is no statute which makes them evidence in a civil action such as this is. 1 Greenl. Ev. § 156.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Slavski
245 Mass. 405 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1923)
Ross v. Cooper
164 N.W. 679 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1916)
Commonwealth v. Turner
224 Mass. 229 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1916)
Nunnally v. Mail & Express Co.
113 A.D. 831 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
42 N.E. 563, 165 Mass. 174, 1896 Mass. LEXIS 208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thayer-v-lombard-mass-1896.