Thavy Chum v. Loretta E. Lynch

669 F. App'x 455
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedOctober 4, 2016
Docket13-70972
StatusUnpublished

This text of 669 F. App'x 455 (Thavy Chum v. Loretta E. Lynch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thavy Chum v. Loretta E. Lynch, 669 F. App'x 455 (9th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Thavy Chum, a native and citizen of Cambodia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s order of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We grant the petition for review, and remand.

Chum was convicted of accessory to a felony under California Penal Code § 32. Applying the interpretation of “obstruction of justice” articulated in Matter of Valenzuela Gallardo, 25 I. & N. Dec. 838 (BIA 2012), the BIA concluded that Chum was removable for having committed an aggravated felony under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii), because her conviction was for “an offense relating to obstruction of justice” under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(S).

In light of our decision in Valenzuela Gallardo v. Lynch, 818 F.3d 808 (9th Cir. 2016), we remand to the BIA for either application of the agency interpretation announced in Matter of Espinoza-Gonzalez, 22 I. & N. Dec. 889 (BIA 1999), or consideration of a new construction of 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(S).

In light of this disposition, we do not reach Chum’s remaining contentions.

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.

**

¶¾⅛ disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Augustin Valenzuela Gallardo v. Loretta E. Lynch
818 F.3d 808 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
VALENZUELA GALLARDO
25 I. & N. Dec. 838 (Board of Immigration Appeals, 2012)
ESPINOZA
22 I. & N. Dec. 889 (Board of Immigration Appeals, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
669 F. App'x 455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thavy-chum-v-loretta-e-lynch-ca9-2016.