T.H. v. La Crosse County

441 N.W.2d 233, 150 Wis. 2d 432, 1989 Wisc. LEXIS 80
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided June 23, 1989·No. Nos. 88-0372, 88-0605·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The court is equally divided on the question of whether the decision of the court of appeals, 147 Wis. 2d 22, 433 N.W.2d 16 (Ct. App. 1988), should be affirmed or reversed. Chief Justice NATHAN S. HEFFERNAN, Justice SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAM-SON, and Justice WILLIAM G. CALLOW being of the opinion that the decision should be affirmed, and Justice ROLAND B. DAY, Justice DONALD W. STEINMETZ, and Justice LOUIS J. CECI being of the opinion that the decision should be reversed. Justice WILLIAM A. BABLITCH did not participate.

Decision affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

T.H. v. La Crosse County, 441 N.W.2d 233, 150 Wis. 2d 432, 1989 Wisc. LEXIS 80 (Wis. 1989).

441 N.W.2d 233 (T.H. v. La Crosse County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

R.A.C.P. v. State
458 N.W.2d 823 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 1990)
C.M.L. v. State
458 N.W.2d 573 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 1990)
In Re Interest of DSP
458 N.W.2d 823 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 1990)
In Interest of RH
441 N.W.2d 233 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1989)