In Interest of RH
This text of 441 N.W.2d 233 (In Interest of RH) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN the INTEREST OF R.H., III, a person under the age of 18: T.H., Appellant,
v.
LA CROSSE COUNTY, Respondent-Petitioner.
IN the INTEREST OF L.H., a person under the age of 18: L.H., Appellant,
v.
STATE of Wisconsin, Respondent-Petitioner.
Supreme Court of Wisconsin.
For the respondents-petitioners, State of Wisconsin and LaCrosse County, the cause was argued by Sally L. *433 Wellman, assistant attorney general, with whom on the briefs was Donald J. Hanaway, attorney general.
For the appellant, T.H., there was a brief and oral argument by Glenn L. Cushing, assistant state public defender.
For the appellant, L.H., there was a brief by Eugene R. Thompson, Madison, and oral argument by Daniel Hildebrand, Madison.
PER CURIAM.
The court is equally divided on the question of whether the decision of the court of appeals, 147 Wis. 2d 22, 433 N.W.2d 16 (Ct. App. 1988), should be affirmed or reversed. Chief Justice NATHAN S. HEFFERNAN, Justice SHIRLEY S. ABRAHASON, and Justice WILLIAM G. CALLOW being of the opinion that the decision should be affirmed, and Justice ROLAND B. DAY, Justice DONALD W. STEIMETZ, and Justice LOUIS J. CECI being of the opinion that the decision should be reversed. Justice WILLIAM A. BABLITCH did not participate.
Decision affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
441 N.W.2d 233, 150 Wis. 2d 432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-interest-of-rh-wis-1989.