Texas Department of Public Safety v. Kaspar

Texas Supreme Court

Texas Department of Public Safety v. Kaspar

369 S.W.3d 172, 55 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 850, 2012 WL 2053301, 2012 Tex. LEXIS 464

CourtTexas Supreme Court

DecidedJune 8, 2012

DocketNo. 10-0983

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 369 S.W.3d 172 (Texas Department of Public Safety v. Kaspar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Texas Department of Public Safety v. Kaspar, 369 S.W.3d 172, 55 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 850, 2012 WL 2053301, 2012 Tex. LEXIS 464 (Tex. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Luke Thomas Kaspar was arrested for driving while intoxicated and provided a breath specimen with an alcohol concentration of 0.188 to 0.199, more than twice the legal limit of 0.08. An administrative law judge sustained the Texas Department of Public Safety’s suspension of Kaspar’s driver’s license, based on the arresting officer’s report and the Breath Test Technical Supervisor Affidavit. Kaspar objected to the admission of the report because it was unsworn and to the admission of the test because neither the breath test technical supervisor nor breath test operator was present as requested. Kaspar did not subpoena the officer. See 1 Tex. Admin. Code § 159.211(c)(2) (2012), adopted 34 Tex. Reg. 334, 335 (2009) (replacing § 159.23(c)(7)). The county court affirmed the suspension, but the court of appeals reversed and rendered. Following its decision in Texas Department of Public Safety v. Catuana, 363 S.W.3d 606 (Tex.App.Austin 2010), the court held that the un-sworn report was inadmissible. 363 S.W.3d 606 (Tex. App.-Austin 2010). The court did not address Kaspar’s other complaints.

We have reversed the court of appeals’ decision in Catuana, 363 S.W.3d 558 (Tex. 2012), and for the reasons explained there, we reverse the court’s decision in this case. We remand the case to the court of appeals for consideration of Kaspar’s other arguments.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Luke Thomas Kaspar was arrested for driving while intoxicated and provided a breath specimen with an alcohol concentration of 0.188 to 0.199, more than twice the legal limit of 0.08. An administrative law judge sustained the Texas Department of Public Safety’s suspension of Kaspar’s driver’s license, based on the arresting officer’s report and the Breath Test Technical Supervisor Affidavit. Kaspar objected to the admission of the report because it was unsworn and to the admission of the test because neither the breath test technical supervisor nor breath test operator was present as requested. Kaspar did not subpoena the officer. See 1 Tex. Admin. Code § 159.211(c)(2) (2012), adopted 34 Tex. Reg. 334, 335 (2009) (replacing § 159.23(c)(7)). The county court affirmed the suspension, but the court of appeals reversed and rendered. Following its decision in Texas Department of Public Safety v. Catuana, 363 S.W.3d 606 (Tex.App.Austin 2010), the court held that the un-sworn report was inadmissible. 363 S.W.3d 606 (Tex. App.-Austin 2010). The court did not address Kaspar’s other complaints.

We have reversed the court of appeals’ decision in Catuana, 363 S.W.3d 558 (Tex. 2012), and for the reasons explained there, we reverse the court’s decision in this case. We remand the case to the court of appeals for consideration of Kaspar’s other arguments.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

369 S.W.3d 172, 55 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 850, 2012 WL 2053301, 2012 Tex. LEXIS 464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/texas-department-of-public-safety-v-kaspar-tex-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack