Tete v. Hardy

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Tete v. Hardy

277 So. 2d 670, 1973 La. LEXIS 5586

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMay 24, 1973

DocketNo. 53470

StatusPublished

This text of 277 So. 2d 670 (Tete v. Hardy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tete v. Hardy, 277 So. 2d 670, 1973 La. LEXIS 5586 (La. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

In re: Mrs. C. M. Tete applying for writs of certiorari and review.

Granted. (See order.)

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Henry J. Roberts, Jr., Judge of the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 20th day of June, 1973, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the 20th day of June, 1973, at 10 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Mrs. C. M. Tete applying for writs of certiorari and review.

Granted. (See order.)

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Henry J. Roberts, Jr., Judge of the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 20th day of June, 1973, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the 20th day of June, 1973, at 10 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

277 So. 2d 670, 1973 La. LEXIS 5586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tete-v-hardy-la-1973.