Krieg v. Sciortino

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Krieg v. Sciortino

341 So. 2d 575, 1977 La. App. LEXIS 4274

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedJanuary 6, 1977

DocketNo. 8318

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 341 So. 2d 575 (Krieg v. Sciortino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Krieg v. Sciortino, 341 So. 2d 575, 1977 La. App. LEXIS 4274 (La. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinions

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

Before LEMMON, STOULIG and BEER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This matter comes before us by reason of motions to dismiss filed in behalf of plaintiff-appellee.

An examination of the record indicates that defendant-appellant did not file a verification of his answer until three days after filing the bond as security for the appeal. Thus, there was no verification in the [576]*576record which is properly before us on appeal, and there has been no timely compliance with the oath requirement of C.C.P. Article 4735 (see Alexander v. Williams,, La.App., 205 So.2d 456), and the suspensive appeal must be dismissed at appellant’s cost. It is so ordered.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI