Testa v. Testa

171 So. 3d 244, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 12827, 2015 WL 5042130
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 27, 2015·No. No. 4D15-1914·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The former husband seeks certiorari review of a trial court order that barred him from further pro se filing in this 2008 post-dissolution family law case. We grant-the petition and quash the order because the trial court did not issue an order to show cause and did not provide notice and an [245]*245opportunity to respond before imposing the sanction. Bolton v. SE Prop. Holdings, LLC, 127 So.3d 746 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013); Delgado v. Hearn, 805 So.2d 1017 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); see also State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999).

On remand, the trial court shall issue an order to show cause and afford the former husband a reasonable time to respond before determining whether the sanction is appropriate.

Petition granted and order quashed.

LEVINE, CONNER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Testa v. Testa, 171 So. 3d 244, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 12827, 2015 WL 5042130 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

171 So. 3d 244 (Testa v. Testa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gary Steinberg v. Eva Cudak
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2026
Preudhomme v. Bailey
204 So. 3d 91 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Frank A. Testa v. Department of Revenue o/b/o Laura Testa
186 So. 3d 614 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)