Frank A. Testa v. Department of Revenue o/b/o Laura Testa
This text of 186 So. 3d 614 (Frank A. Testa v. Department of Revenue o/b/o Laura Testa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We. affirm without discussion the circuit court’s orders: (1) granting the Department of Revenue’s motion for civil contempt against the father; and (2) denying the father’s motion to vacate the contempt order and motion for rehearing. The father’s argument that the circuit court erred in entering an order barring him from further pro se filing already was addressed in our case no. . 4D15-1914, in which the father petitioned, for a writ of certiorari. We granted the father’s petition and quashed the order, with directions to issue an order to show cause and afford the father a réasonable time to' respond before determining whether the sanction is *615 appropriate. Testa v. Testa, 171 So.3d 244, 244-45 (Fla. 4th -DCA 2015).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
186 So. 3d 614, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 3109, 2016 WL 805277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frank-a-testa-v-department-of-revenue-obo-laura-testa-fladistctapp-2016.