Tessera Inc v. International Trade Commission

Opinion

NOTE: This order is n0nprecedentia|. United States Court of Appea|s for the Federa| Circuit 2010-1176 TESSERA, |NC., /-\ppeI|ant, v. |NTERNAT|ONAL TRADE COMM|SS|0N, Appei|ee, and ELP|DA MEMORY, INC. and ELP|DA |V|E|VIORY (USA) |NC., ntervenors, and SMART MODULAR TECHNOLOG|ES, |NC., !nterven0r, and ACER, |NC., ACER AMER|CA CORPORAT|ON, NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORAT|ON, NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORAT|ON U.S.A., and POWERCH|P SEM|CONDUCTOR CORPORAT|ON, ntervenors, and RAMAXEL TECHNOLOG‘( LTD., ntervenor, and K|NGSTON TECHNOLOGY COIV|PANY, |NC.,

On appeal from the United States international Trade Commission in ntervenor. investigation No. 337-TA-630. E|pida Memory, Inc. et a|., SMART Modu|ar Technologies, |nc., Acer inc et al Ramaxe| Techno|ogy Ltd., and Kingston Techno|ogy Company, Inc. each move without opposition for leave to intervene. Upon consideration thereof, |T |S ORDERED THAT: The motions are granted The revised official caption is reflected above ON MOT|ON FOR THE COURT "AR 99 wm 131 Jan i-iorbaly my Date Jan Horba|y z 1 Morgan Chu, Esq. Panyin A. Hughes, Esq. Larry L. Shatzer, Esq. Jonathan M. James, Esq. G. Hopl