Tesler v. Tesler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Tesler v. Tesler

228 A.D.2d 491, 644 N.Y.2d 316, 644 N.Y.S.2d 316, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6554

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 10, 1996

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 228 A.D.2d 491 (Tesler v. Tesler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tesler v. Tesler, 228 A.D.2d 491, 644 N.Y.2d 316, 644 N.Y.S.2d 316, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6554 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

[492]*492Contrary to the husband’s contention, the court’s award of sole custody of the parties’ child to the wife was proper as the parties were unable to cooperate on matters concerning the child (see, Matter of Laura A. K. v Timothy M., 204 AD2d 325).

Further, the court properly attributed and imputed to the husband moneys received from his parents (see, Domestic Relations Law § 240 [1-b] [b] [5] [iv] [D]; Lapkin v Lapkin, 208 AD2d 474) and properly directed him to pay for 61% of the child’s unreimbursed medical expenses (see, Domestic Relations Law § 240 [1-b] [c] [5]).

The husband’s remaining contentions are without merit. Rosenblatt, J. P., Ritter, Copertino and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[492]*492Contrary to the husband’s contention, the court’s award of sole custody of the parties’ child to the wife was proper as the parties were unable to cooperate on matters concerning the child (see, Matter of Laura A. K. v Timothy M., 204 AD2d 325).

Further, the court properly attributed and imputed to the husband moneys received from his parents (see, Domestic Relations Law § 240 [1-b] [b] [5] [iv] [D]; Lapkin v Lapkin, 208 AD2d 474) and properly directed him to pay for 61% of the child’s unreimbursed medical expenses (see, Domestic Relations Law § 240 [1-b] [c] [5]).

The husband’s remaining contentions are without merit. Rosenblatt, J. P., Ritter, Copertino and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

228 A.D.2d 491, 644 N.Y.2d 316, 644 N.Y.S.2d 316, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6554, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tesler-v-tesler-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack