Terry v. Young Men's Hebrew Ass'n of Washington Heights, Inc.

168 A.D.2d 399, 563 N.Y.S.2d 408, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15759
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 27, 1990
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 168 A.D.2d 399 (Terry v. Young Men's Hebrew Ass'n of Washington Heights, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Terry v. Young Men's Hebrew Ass'n of Washington Heights, Inc., 168 A.D.2d 399, 563 N.Y.S.2d 408, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15759 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Beverly Cohen, J.), entered October 25, 1989, granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment [400]*400against defendant as to liability only, and granting defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment against third-party defendant as to liability only, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff, an employee of third-party defendant, Careful Cleaning Contractors, was injured when he fell three stories while cleaning a window on premises owned by defendant and third-party plaintiff Young Men’s Hebrew Association of Washington Heights, Inc. The record indicates that plaintiff leaned out of a third-floor window to clean its exterior when part of the window frame gave way. Plaintiff had not been provided with a safety belt, window anchors, safety line or other devices.

Pursuant to Labor Law § 240 (1), the defendant owner is liable as a matter of law. (See, Yaeger v New York Tel. Co., 148 AD2d 308.) The fact that plaintiff also sought recovery under section 202 of the Labor Law, specifically pertaining to "window cleaning”, does not preclude plaintiff from, relying on section 240. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Carro, Asch and Wallach, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harzewski v. Centennial Development Ltd.
270 A.D.2d 888 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Ojeda v. Peak Janitorial Services, Inc.
270 A.D.2d 322 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Chapman v. International Business Machines Corp.
253 A.D.2d 123 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Bauer v. Female Academy of the Sacred Heart
250 A.D.2d 298 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Williamson v. 16 West 57th Street Co.
256 A.D.2d 507 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Cruz v. Bridge Harbor Heights Associates
249 A.D.2d 44 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Vernum v. Zilka
241 A.D.2d 885 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Bustamante v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.
241 A.D.2d 327 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Buendia v. New York National Bank
223 A.D.2d 456 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Rooney v. Port Authority of New York & New Jersey
875 F. Supp. 253 (S.D. New York, 1995)
Barnaby v. A. & C. Properties
188 A.D.2d 958 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Keane v. Sin Hang Lee
188 A.D.2d 636 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Ferrari v. Niasher Realty, Inc.
175 A.D.2d 591 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
168 A.D.2d 399, 563 N.Y.S.2d 408, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15759, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/terry-v-young-mens-hebrew-assn-of-washington-heights-inc-nyappdiv-1990.