Harzewski v. Centennial Development Ltd.

270 A.D.2d 888, 705 N.Y.S.2d 153, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3475
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 29, 2000·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, cross motion denied, Labor Law § 240 (1) claim reinstated and motion granted. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment on liability on the Labor Law § 240 (1) claim and in granting the cross motion of defendant Centennial Development Ltd. for partial summary judgment seeking dismissal of that claim. Plaintiff was injured when he fell while cleaning the exterior windows of a two-story commercial building. While the cleaning of windows “does not include * * * routine, household window washing” (Brown v Christopher St. Owners Corp., 87 NY2d 938, 939, rearg denied 88 NY2d 875), the statute applies where, as here, a professional window washer was hired to clean the exterior windows of a multistory building (see, Terry v Young Men’s Hebrew Assn., 168 AD2d 399, 400, affd 78 NY2d 978; Retamal v Osborne Mem. Home Assn., 256 AD2d 506, 507; Williamson v 16 W. 57th St. Co., 256 AD2d 507, 509). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Niagara County, Joslin, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Scudder and Lawton, JJ.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harzewski v. Centennial Development Ltd., 270 A.D.2d 888, 705 N.Y.S.2d 153, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3475 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

270 A.D.2d 888 (Harzewski v. Centennial Development Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harzewski v. Centennial Development, Ltd.
309 A.D.2d 1188 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)