Terry v. Wonder Seal Co.

170 S.E.2d 745, 120 Ga. App. 423, 1969 Ga. App. LEXIS 802
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 2, 1969
Docket44650
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 170 S.E.2d 745 (Terry v. Wonder Seal Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Terry v. Wonder Seal Co., 170 S.E.2d 745, 120 Ga. App. 423, 1969 Ga. App. LEXIS 802 (Ga. Ct. App. 1969).

Opinion

Evans, Judge.

1. The counterclaim based upon fraudulent misrepresentations fails to set out any claim for malicious use of process.

2. Damages for malicious use and abuse of process in this civil action cannot be recovered by the counterclaim in the trial of the same action. Fender v. Ramsey & Phillips, 131 Ga. 440, 442 (62 SE 527); Ellis v. Millen Hotel Co., 192 Ga. 66, 69 (14 SE2d 565); Wallace v. Jones, 101 Ga. App. 563 (114 SE2d 436) and cit.

3. Only by 'Code § 20-1404 can expenses of litigation (attorney’s fees) be sought by the plaintiff — not the defendant. Busbee v. Sellers, 71 Ga. App. 26, 28 (29 SE2d 710).

4. Neither of the only two elements of damage sought and awarded in the counterclaim (punitive damages and attorney’s fees) is recoverable unless there is a right under the pleadings and evidence to recover general, nominal, or special damages. See Love v. National Liberty Ins. Co., 157 Ga. 259 (121 SE 648); Beverly v. Observer Publishing Co., 88 Ga. App. 490 (77 SE2d 80); Gartrell v. Afro-American Life Ins. Co., 88 Ga. App. 806 (78 SE2d 92); Bigelow-Sanford Carpet Co. v. Goodroe, 98 Ga. App. 394 (5, 6) (106 SE2d 45). Accordingly, the trial court did not err in its judgment vacating the verdict (and, by necessary implication, the judgment *424 based thereon) in favor of the counterclaimant and in thereafter dismissing the counterclaim.

Submitted September 11, 1969 Decided October 2, 1969. Bullock, Yancey & Mitchell, Kyle Yancey, for appellant. Evelyn M. Highsmith, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Pannell and Quillian, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barnett v. Morrow
396 S.E.2d 11 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1990)
Vogtle v. Coleman
376 S.E.2d 861 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1989)
Lane Co. v. Taylor
330 S.E.2d 112 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1985)
Capitol City Roofing, Inc. v. Wentz
300 S.E.2d 322 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1983)
Quality Screen Process Corp. v. Collins
265 S.E.2d 358 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)
Medoc Corp. v. Keel
263 S.E.2d 543 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1979)
Outlaw v. Transit Homes, Inc.
244 S.E.2d 633 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1978)
Canal Insurance Co. v. Cambron
242 S.E.2d 32 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1978)
Cleary v. Southern Motors of Savannah, Inc.
235 S.E.2d 623 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1977)
Monumental Properties, Inc. v. Johnson
220 S.E.2d 55 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1975)
Prairieland Broadcasters of Georgia, Inc. v. Thompson
217 S.E.2d 296 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1975)
Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Coburn
209 S.E.2d 655 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)
Pickett v. Chamblee Construction Co.
186 S.E.2d 123 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1971)
Metro Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. v. Pearce
175 S.E.2d 910 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
170 S.E.2d 745, 120 Ga. App. 423, 1969 Ga. App. LEXIS 802, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/terry-v-wonder-seal-co-gactapp-1969.