Territory v. Godfrey
6 Dakota 46
Opinion
1. The indictment was sufficient in form.
2. The court did not err in permitting witnesses to testify whose names were not on the indictment.
3. The court did not err in permitting the mother to testify to the fact of immediate complaint after the assault. The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Territory v. Godfrey, 6 Dakota 46 (dakotasup 1888).
6 Dakota 46 (Territory v. Godfrey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State Ex Rel. Andrews v. Superior Court
5 P.2d 192 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1931)
State v. Matejousky
115 N.W. 96 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1908)
State v. Cambron
105 N.W. 241 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1905)
State v. Reddington
64 N.W. 170 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1895)
State v. Church
60 N.W. 143 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1894)
State v. Boughner
59 N.W. 736 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1894)