Territory v. Godfrey
6 Dakota 46
This text of 6 Dakota 46 (Territory v. Godfrey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Territory v. Godfrey, 6 Dakota 46 (dakotasup 1888).
Opinion
1. The indictment was sufficient in form.
2. The court did not err in permitting witnesses to testify whose names were not on the indictment.
3. The court did not err in permitting the mother to testify to the fact of immediate complaint after the assault. The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State Ex Rel. Andrews v. Superior Court
5 P.2d 192 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1931)
State v. Matejousky
115 N.W. 96 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1908)
State v. Cambron
105 N.W. 241 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1905)
State v. Reddington
64 N.W. 170 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1895)
State v. Church
60 N.W. 143 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1894)
State v. Boughner
59 N.W. 736 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1894)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
6 Dakota 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/territory-v-godfrey-dakotasup-1888.