Terrence King v. Robert Burton

• Court: District Court, C.D. California
• Decided: November 18, 2021
• Docket: 5:21-cv-00088
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TERRANCE KING, Case No. 5:21-cv-00088-JAK-PD

12 Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT 13 v. AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, 14 CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF 15 ROBERT BURTON, Warden, UNITED STATE 16 Respondent. MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF 17 APPEALABILITY

19 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the 20 records on file, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate 21 Judge (“Report”), Petitioner’s Objections to the Report, and the Supplemental 22 Statement of Decision. The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those 23 portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the 24 Report and the Supplemental Statement of Decision and adopts them as its 25 own findings and conclusions. Accordingly, the Petition is dismissed with 26 prejudice. 27 Further, for the reasons stated in the Report and the Supplemental 28 Statement of Decision, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a 1 substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, and therefore a 2 certificate of appealability is denied. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Fed. R. App. 3 P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003). 4 5 DATED: _N_o_v_e_m__b_er_ _1_8,_ 2_0_2_1_ 6 ______________________________________ 7 JOHN A. KRONSTADT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28