Terceira v. Terceira

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Terceira v. Terceira

193 A.D.2d 729, 598 N.Y.S.2d 983, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4949

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 17, 1993

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 193 A.D.2d 729 (Terceira v. Terceira) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Terceira v. Terceira, 193 A.D.2d 729, 598 N.Y.S.2d 983, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4949 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for divorce and ancillary relief, the husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Dunn, J.), dated April 6, 1991, as directed the husband to pay the sum of $150 per week in pendente lite child support.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the best remedy for the perceived inequities in the pendente lite award is a speedy trial at which the disputed issues as to the financial capacity and circumstances of the parties can be fully explored (see, Mulcahy v Mulcahy, 170 AD2d 587; Marohn v Marohn, 157 AD2d 771; Frankel v Frankel, 150 AD2d 520). Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Miller, Ritter and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for divorce and ancillary relief, the husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Dunn, J.), dated April 6, 1991, as directed the husband to pay the sum of $150 per week in pendente lite child support.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the best remedy for the perceived inequities in the pendente lite award is a speedy trial at which the disputed issues as to the financial capacity and circumstances of the parties can be fully explored (see, Mulcahy v Mulcahy, 170 AD2d 587; Marohn v Marohn, 157 AD2d 771; Frankel v Frankel, 150 AD2d 520). Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Miller, Ritter and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

193 A.D.2d 729, 598 N.Y.S.2d 983, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4949, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/terceira-v-terceira-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack