Terceira v. Terceira

193 A.D.2d 729, 598 N.Y.S.2d 983, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4949
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 17, 1993·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

In an action for divorce and ancillary relief, the husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Dunn, J.), dated April 6, 1991, as directed the husband to pay the sum of $150 per week in pendente lite child support.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the best remedy for the perceived inequities in the pendente lite award is a speedy trial at which the disputed issues as to the financial capacity and circumstances of the parties can be fully explored (see, Mulcahy v Mulcahy, 170 AD2d 587; Marohn v Marohn, 157 AD2d 771; Frankel v Frankel, 150 AD2d 520). Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Miller, Ritter and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Terceira v. Terceira, 193 A.D.2d 729, 598 N.Y.S.2d 983, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4949 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

193 A.D.2d 729 (Terceira v. Terceira) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Calia v. Calia
250 A.D.2d 563 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Hudak v. Hudak
222 A.D.2d 404 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Patanjo v. Patanjo
216 A.D.2d 446 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Goldstein v. Shapiro
208 A.D.2d 676 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)