Goldstein v. Shapiro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Goldstein v. Shapiro

208 A.D.2d 676, 618 N.Y.S.2d 535, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9945

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 17, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 208 A.D.2d 676 (Goldstein v. Shapiro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goldstein v. Shapiro, 208 A.D.2d 676, 618 N.Y.S.2d 535, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9945 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Meehan, J.), dated February 19, 1993, as awarded the plaintiff the sum of $100 per week in pendente lite child support and denied those branches of his cross motion which were for maintenance and counsel fees.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the best remedy for the perceived inequities in the pendente lite award is a speedy trial at which the disputed issues as to the financial capacity and circumstances of the parties can be fully explored (see, Terceira v Terceira, 193 AD2d 729; Mulcahy v Mulcahy, 170 AD2d 587; Marohn v Marohn, 157 AD2d 771). Thompson, J. P., Miller, O’Brien, Santucci and Joy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Meehan, J.), dated February 19, 1993, as awarded the plaintiff the sum of $100 per week in pendente lite child support and denied those branches of his cross motion which were for maintenance and counsel fees.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the best remedy for the perceived inequities in the pendente lite award is a speedy trial at which the disputed issues as to the financial capacity and circumstances of the parties can be fully explored (see, Terceira v Terceira, 193 AD2d 729; Mulcahy v Mulcahy, 170 AD2d 587; Marohn v Marohn, 157 AD2d 771). Thompson, J. P., Miller, O’Brien, Santucci and Joy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

208 A.D.2d 676, 618 N.Y.S.2d 535, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9945, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldstein-v-shapiro-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack