Tequre v. Holder

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 24, 2011·No. 10-1470·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1470

ZENEBECH TESFAYE TEQURE,

Petitioner,

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: January 7, 2011 Decided: January 24, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Oti W. Nwosu, THE LAW OFFICE OF OTI W. NWOSU, Arlington, Virginia, for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Emily Anne Radford, Assistant Director, Jesse Lloyd Busen, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Zenebech Tesfaye Tequre, a native and citizen of

Ethiopia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of

Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying her motion to reconsider

its refusal to reopen immigration proceedings. We have reviewed

the record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not

abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See 8 C.F.R.

§ 1003.2(a) (2010). Accordingly, we deny the petition for

review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Tequre

(B.I.A. Mar. 25, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tequre v. Holder, (4th Cir. 2011).

Tequre v. Holder (Tequre v. Holder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related