Tequre v. Holder
This text of Tequre v. Holder (Tequre v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1470
ZENEBECH TESFAYE TEQURE,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Submitted: January 7, 2011 Decided: January 24, 2011
Before NIEMEYER, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Oti W. Nwosu, THE LAW OFFICE OF OTI W. NWOSU, Arlington, Virginia, for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Emily Anne Radford, Assistant Director, Jesse Lloyd Busen, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Zenebech Tesfaye Tequre, a native and citizen of
Ethiopia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of
Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying her motion to reconsider
its refusal to reopen immigration proceedings. We have reviewed
the record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not
abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See 8 C.F.R.
§ 1003.2(a) (2010). Accordingly, we deny the petition for
review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Tequre
(B.I.A. Mar. 25, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tequre v. Holder, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tequre-v-holder-ca4-2011.