Tennessee Central Railway Company v. J. M. Rountree, District Director of Internal Revenue

245 F.2d 955, 52 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 394, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 5284
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedJune 1, 1957
Docket13140_1
StatusPublished

This text of 245 F.2d 955 (Tennessee Central Railway Company v. J. M. Rountree, District Director of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tennessee Central Railway Company v. J. M. Rountree, District Director of Internal Revenue, 245 F.2d 955, 52 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 394, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 5284 (6th Cir. 1957).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming before the court on the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised,

Now, therefore, It is Ordered, Adjudged, and Decreed that the judgment of the district court be and is hereby affirmed in accordance with the reasoning and conclusions, and upon the authority, of Standard Oil Company v. McMahon, 2 Cir., 1957, 244 F.2d 11.

Judge Miller is of the opinion that the judgment should be reversed for the reasons given in the dissenting opinion in Standard Oil Company v. McMahon, 2 Cir., 1957, 244 F.2d 11.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
245 F.2d 955, 52 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 394, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 5284, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tennessee-central-railway-company-v-j-m-rountree-district-director-of-ca6-1957.