Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Tenenbaum v. Jackson Surrey Co.

Tenenbaum v. Jackson Surrey Co.

111 A.D.2d 752, 489 N.Y.S.2d 863, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49994
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 3, 1985·Published

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to Executive Law § 298 to review an order of the State Division of Human Rights, dated June 17, 1983, which, following a hearing after remand, determined that there was no probable cause to believe that respondent Jackson Surrey Co. was guilty of an unlawful discriminatory practice relating to employment, based on age.

[753]*753Order confirmed and proceeding dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The determination by the State Division of Human Rights is supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole and was not arbitrary, capricious or an abuse of discretion (see, Executive Law § 298; State Off. of Drug Abuse Servs, v State Human Rights Appeal Bd., 48 NY2d 276, 284; Matter of Board of Educ. v New York State Div. of Human Rights [Burns], 56 NY2d 257, 261; Matter of Hickman v Roslyn Air Natl. Guard, 99 AD2d 837). Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, Bracken and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tenenbaum v. Jackson Surrey Co., 111 A.D.2d 752, 489 N.Y.S.2d 863, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49994 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

111 A.D.2d 752 (Tenenbaum v. Jackson Surrey Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Office of Drug Abuse Services v. State Human Rights Appeal Board
397 N.E.2d 1314 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
Board of Education v. New York State Division of Human Rights
436 N.E.2d 1301 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
Hickman v. Roslyn Air National Guard
99 A.D.2d 837 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)