Hickman v. Roslyn Air National Guard

99 A.D.2d 837, 472 N.Y.S.2d 438, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17245
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 27, 1984·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review a determination of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated December 15,1982, which affirmed an order of the State Division of Human Rights determining that there was no probable cause to believe that respondent Roslyn Air National Guard was guilty of an unlawful discriminatory practice relating to employment, based on disability. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed, without costs or disbursements. The determination by the State Division of Human Rights is supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole, and was not arbitrary, capricious, or an abuse of discretion (see Executive Law, § 298; State Off. of Drug Abuse Servs. v State Human Rights Appeal Bd., 48 NY2d 276; Matter of Mize v State Div. of Human Rights, 33 NY2d 53, 57). Lazer, J. P., Gibbons, Thompson and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hickman v. Roslyn Air National Guard, 99 A.D.2d 837, 472 N.Y.S.2d 438, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17245 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

99 A.D.2d 837 (Hickman v. Roslyn Air National Guard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kolomick v. New York Air National Guard
219 A.D.2d 367 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Tenenbaum v. Jackson Surrey Co.
111 A.D.2d 752 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)