Tejuana Dillard v. Director, Division of Workforce Services; And Na Security, Inc.
Opinion
Cite as 2026 Ark. App. 291 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION I
No. E-26-15
Opinion Delivered May 13, 2026 TEJUANA DILLARD APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE ARKANSAS BOARD OF REVIEW
V. [NO. 2025-BR-00806]
DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF WORKFORCE SERVICES; AND NA SECURITY, INC. REVERSED AND REMANDED APPELLEES
N. MARK KLAPPENBACH, Chief Judge Tejuana Dillard appeals from a decision of the Arkansas Board of Review dismissing her appeal as untimely and denying her request to reopen the appeal. We reverse and remand.
Dillard applied for unemployment benefits in June 2024 and began receiving benefits. On September 25, 2024, however, the Division of Workforce Services issued a notice of agency determination finding Dillard ineligible to receive benefits. Nearly a year later, on August 21, 2025, Dillard was mailed a notice of overpayment determination (non- fraud). This notice stated that Dillard was required to repay $3094 in unemployment benefits that she was not entitled to receive. The notice stated that Dillard had twenty calendar days to appeal the determination. On September 3, 2025, Dillard filed an appeal
with the Arkansas Appeal Tribunal. Her petition for appeal stated that she was appealing the issue of “repayment.”
Upon receiving Dillard’s appeal, the Tribunal erroneously treated it as an appeal of the Division’s September 2024 determination that Dillard was ineligible for benefits. This led to the Tribunal, and ultimately the Board, dismissing the appeal as untimely. The error was that no such appeal was before the Tribunal. See Fulmer v. Dir., 2026 Ark. App. 152. Rather, as stated in her petition for appeal, Dillard was appealing the issue of repayment. This issue was decided in the August 21, 2025 notice of overpayment determination, and her appeal was timely as to that notice. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for Dillard’s appeal of that determination to be addressed.
Reversed and remanded.
GLADWIN and HIXSON, JJ., agree.
Tejuana Dillard, pro se appellant.
Cynthia L. Uhrynowycz, for appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tejuana Dillard v. Director, Division of Workforce Services; And Na Security, Inc. (Tejuana Dillard v. Director, Division of Workforce Services; And Na Security, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.