Tejas Elevator Co. v. Concord Elevator, Inc.

982 S.W.2d 578, 1998 Tex. App. LEXIS 7149, 1998 WL 793015
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 17, 1998
DocketNo. 05-98-01598-CV
StatusPublished
Cited by22 cases

This text of 982 S.W.2d 578 (Tejas Elevator Co. v. Concord Elevator, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tejas Elevator Co. v. Concord Elevator, Inc., 982 S.W.2d 578, 1998 Tex. App. LEXIS 7149, 1998 WL 793015 (Tex. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

WRIGHT, Justice.

Tejas Elevator Company is appealing the justice court’s June 29, 1998 final default judgment. On October 1, 1998, this Court sent a letter informing appellant that, after reviewing its notice of appeal for restricted appeal, we had questions concerning the Court’s jurisdiction over this cause. Specifically, we referred appellant to section 51.001 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code, which permits a party to appeal a final judgment in a justice court to the county or district courts. See Tex. Civ. PRAC. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.001 (Vernon 1997). We requested appellant to file a letter brief, on or before October 12, 1998, explaining how this Court has jurisdiction over this cause.

In a letter brief received by this Court on October 14, 1998, appellant concedes that a party may appeal a justice court [579]*579judgment to the county or district court.1 However, appellant contends that it exercised due diligence in attempting to have the justice court’s default judgment reviewed and requests this Court to invoke rule 2 of the rules of appellate procedure and exercise jurisdiction over this appeal. Rule 2 authorizes an appellate court to suspend a rule’s operation in a particular case to expedite a decision or for other good cause. See Tex.R.App. P. 2. However, nothing in rule 2 authorizes this Court to exercise jurisdiction over an appeal if none exists.

Jurisdiction over an appeal of a justice court judgment lies in the county or district court. See Tex. Civ. PRAC. & Rem. Code Ann. §§ 51.001, 51.002 (Vernon 1997); Tex.R. Civ. P. 574b. To invoke this Court’s jurisdiction, appellant must obtain a final, appealable order or judgment from the county or district court. See, e.g., Winrock Houston Assocs. Ltd. Partnership v. Bergstrom, 879 S.W.2d 144, 151-52 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1994, no writ).

Accordingly, on the Court’s own motion, this appeal is DISMISSED for want of jurisdiction. See Tex,R.App. P. 42.3(a).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Liliane Ndagang v. Ereyhon Denise Foster
Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin), 2026
Kodi McCuin v. Vinyard at the Ranch
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2019
Bobby Brown v. Geannie Jones and John Jackson
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2015
Alfred Lee Stone v. Brad Livingston
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2015
Lee Miller v. R. Henderson
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2013
Smith, Lucille v. Zurich North America
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2012
Robin Whisenhunt v. Trudy Hill
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2012
in Re Charles Anthony Allen, Sr.
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2011
Taurus Brown v. Gennie Jones
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2008
Elton Ortiz v. Zonia Scott
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2005
Automania, L.L.C. v. Jason May
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2004
Eula McLean v. El Paso Police Department
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003
James R. Artrip, Jr. v. State of Texas
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2002

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
982 S.W.2d 578, 1998 Tex. App. LEXIS 7149, 1998 WL 793015, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tejas-elevator-co-v-concord-elevator-inc-texapp-1998.