Angela Marie Wiltz D/B/A Davenport Lounge and Andrew J. Tejeda v. Stephen E. Lovick

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-12-00401-CV

Angela Marie WILTZ d/b/a Davenport Lounge and Andrew J. Tejeda, Appellants

v.

Stephen E. LOVICK, Appellee

From the Justice of the Peace Precinct 3, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 30-C-11-02006-01 Honorable Keith Baker, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 12, 2012

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

Appellants Angela Marie Wiltz d/b/a Davenport Lounge and Andrew J. Tejeda have filed

a notice of restricted appeal in this court. Appellants seek to appeal a judgment of the Justice

Court, Precinct Three, Bexar County, Texas. We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

In Texas, a court of appeals has appellate jurisdiction of all civil cases within its district

of which the district or county courts have jurisdiction when the amount in controversy or the

judgment rendered exceeds $250, exclusive of interest and costs. TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. 04-12-00401-CV

§ 22.220(a) (West Supp. 2012). To invoke the jurisdiction of a court of appeals, an appellant

must obtain a final, appealable judgment from the county or district court. Tejas Elevator Co. v.

Concord Elevator, Inc., 982 S.W.2d 578, 579 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1998, no pet.); see TEX.

GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 28.052, 28.053 (West Supp. 2012) (authorizing, in claims originating in

small claims court, an appeal to a court of appeals following trial de novo in county court). A

justice court judgment cannot be appealed directly to a court of appeals. Whisenhunt v. Hill, No.

02-12-00310-CV, 2012 WL 3733868, at *1 (Tex. App.—Waco August 30, 2012, no pet. h.). A

justice court judgment must be appealed directly to the county or the district court. See TEX. CIV.

PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.001 (West 2008); TEX. R. CIV. P. 571-574b.

Here, appellants seek to appeal directly to this court from a justice court judgment. On

August 9, 2012, we ordered appellants to show cause in writing why this appeal should not be

dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellants filed a response in which they assert this court has

jurisdiction pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 30. See TEX. R. APP. P. 30. Rule 30

governs restricted appeals; however, it does not expand the jurisdiction of a court of appeals to

include appeals from justice court judgments. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.220(a); id.

We conclude we lack jurisdiction over this appeal. We, therefore, dismiss this appeal for

lack of jurisdiction. See Whisenhunt, 2012 WL 3733868, at *1 (dismissing for lack of

jurisdiction a restricted appeal from a justice court judgment); Tejas Elevator, 982 S.W.2d at 579

(dismissing for lack of jurisdiction an appeal from a justice court judgment).

-2-