Teer v. State
This text of 923 S.W.2d 11 (Teer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
OPINION ON STATE’S PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Appellant was convicted by a jury of aggravated kidnapping and sentenced to forty years imprisonment. The Court of Appeals affirmed appellant’s conviction, but reversed the judgment as to punishment. Teer v. State, 895 S.W.2d 845 (Tex.App.— Waco 1995). The McLennan County District Attorney and the State Prosecuting Attorney (collectively, “the State”) filed petitions for discretionary review which we granted.
[12]*12Upon careful consideration of the grounds for review and the briefs, we conclude that the State’s petitions were improvidently granted. Accordingly, the State’s petitions for discretionary review are dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
923 S.W.2d 11, 1996 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 54, 1996 WL 195314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/teer-v-state-texcrimapp-1996.