Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Teem v. Town of Ellijay

Teem v. Town of Ellijay

15 S.E. 33, 89 Ga. 154
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 31, 1892
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 15 S.E. 33 (Teem v. Town of Ellijay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Teem v. Town of Ellijay, 15 S.E. 33, 89 Ga. 154 (Ga. 1892).

Opinion

[155]*155 Judgment affirmed.

The verdict was in favor of the defendant. The plaintiff moved for a new trial on the grounds, that the verdict was contrary to law and evidence, and that the court erred in sustaining the demurrer to that part of the declaration setting out the tortious act of plaintiff and the resulting and direct damages growing out of the levy of thefi.fa. The motion was overruled, and the plaintiff excepted. C. D. Phillips and Gr. R. Brown, for plaintiff. Clay & Blair and J. P. Perry, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cohen v. Garland
167 S.E.2d 599 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1969)
Bigby v. Bigby
100 S.E.2d 734 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1957)
Martin v. Newberry
151 S.E. 380 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1930)
Perry v. Griffin
146 S.E. 567 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)
Houze v. Blackwell
93 S.E. 16 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Dunn v. Fairbanks-Morse Co.
91 S.E. 1005 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
County of Stark v. Mischel
156 N.W. 931 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1916)
Hutchens v. Seaboard Air-Line Railway
87 S.E. 28 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1915)
Hoke v. City of Atlanta
33 S.E. 412 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)
Cohen v. Troy Laundry & Mfg. Co.
25 S.E. 689 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1896)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 S.E. 33, 89 Ga. 154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/teem-v-town-of-ellijay-ga-1892.