Houze v. Blackwell

93 S.E. 16, 20 Ga. App. 438, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 928
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 29, 1917
Docket8095
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 93 S.E. 16 (Houze v. Blackwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Houze v. Blackwell, 93 S.E. 16, 20 Ga. App. 438, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 928 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

When this case was before the Supreme Court (144 Ga. 700, 87 S. E. 1054), that court decided that the petition, properly construed, showed the action to be for deceit. An action for deceit is an action in tort. Civil Code, 1910, § 4410; Brooke v. Cole, 108 Ga. 252.(33 S. E. 849);. Brady v. Evans, 78 Fed. 558-560 (24 C. C. A. 236); Lamb v. Howard, 145 Ga. 847 (90 S. E. 63). “A tort is a legal wrong committed upon a person or property, independent of contract.” Civil Code (1910), § 4403. “When a transaction partakes of the nature both of a tort and .a contract, the party complainant may waive the one and rely solely upon the other.” Civil Code (1910); § 4407. “A claim arising out of an alleged tort can not be joined in the same action with a claim for money had and received, the rule of the code being that [440]*440plaintiff may join all causes of action of like nature; causes ex-delicto can not be joined with causes ex contractu.” Teem v. Ellijay, 89 Ga. 155 (2) (15 S. E. 33); Sharpe v. Columbus Iron Works Co., 136 Ga. 483 (71 S. E. 787); Croghan v. New York Underwriters Agency, 53 Ga. 109 (2); Cheney v. Powell, 88 Ga. 633 (15 S. E. 750); Brooke v. Cole, supra; Hutchens v. Seaboard Air-Line Railway, 144 Ga. 313 (2), 315 (87 S. E. 28); Dunn v. Fairbanks-Morse Co., 19 Ga. App. 548 (91 S. E. 1005); Peel v. Bryson, 72 Ga. 335; Perdue v. Harwell, 80 Ga. 150 (4 S. E. 877). In the instant case plaintiff is bound by his election to sue for the tort, and the court erred in permitting the petition to be so amended that he could proceed for money had and received. As a new trial is to be granted on account of this error, it is unnecessary to discuss the other alleged errors.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, P. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cohen v. Garland
167 S.E.2d 599 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1969)
Williams v. Northside Realty Associates, Inc.
157 S.E.2d 166 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1967)
Miami Industrial Bank v. Dunn
24 S.E.2d 136 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1943)
Martin v. Newberry
151 S.E. 380 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1930)
Perry v. Griffin
146 S.E. 567 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)
Tench v. Downey Hospital Inc.
135 S.E. 106 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
93 S.E. 16, 20 Ga. App. 438, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 928, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/houze-v-blackwell-gactapp-1917.