Teel v. Khurana
525 U.S. 979, 119 S. Ct. 442
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 9, 1998·No. No. 97-1507·Published·Cited by 14 cases
Opinion
C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of petitioners for double costs denied. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded with instructions to dismiss [980] the ease as moot. See United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U. S. 36 (1950).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Teel v. Khurana, 525 U.S. 979, 119 S. Ct. 442 (1998).
525 U.S. 979 (Teel v. Khurana) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
North Cypress Medical Center Operating Co. v. Cigna Healthcare
781 F.3d 182 (Fifth Circuit, 2015)
ISystems v. Spark Networks, Ltd.
428 F. App'x 368 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)
Abraham v. Singh
480 F.3d 351 (Fifth Circuit, 2007)
Clark v. Stipe Law Firm, L.L.P.
320 F. Supp. 2d 1207 (W.D. Oklahoma, 2004)
Anderson v. Ayling
297 F. Supp. 2d 805 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2003)
Alden v. Allied Adult & Child Clinic, L.L.C.
171 F. Supp. 2d 647 (E.D. Louisiana, 2001)
Livingston Downs Racing Ass'n v. Jefferson Downs Corp.
192 F. Supp. 2d 519 (M.D. Louisiana, 2001)
St Paul Mercury Ins v. Williamson
Fifth Circuit, 2000
St. Paul Mercury Insurance v. Williamson
224 F.3d 425 (Fifth Circuit, 2000)
Khurana v. Innov Hlth Care
164 F.3d 900 (Fifth Circuit, 1999)
Khurana v. Innovative Health Care Systems, Inc.
164 F.3d 900 (Fifth Circuit, 1999)