Teel v. Khurana

525 U.S. 979, 119 S. Ct. 442
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 9, 1998·No. No. 97-1507·Published·Cited by 14 cases

Opinion

C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of petitioners for double costs denied. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded with instructions to dismiss [980] the ease as moot. See United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U. S. 36 (1950).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Teel v. Khurana, 525 U.S. 979, 119 S. Ct. 442 (1998).

525 U.S. 979 (Teel v. Khurana) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

ISystems v. Spark Networks, Ltd.
428 F. App'x 368 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)
Abraham v. Singh
480 F.3d 351 (Fifth Circuit, 2007)
Clark v. Stipe Law Firm, L.L.P.
320 F. Supp. 2d 1207 (W.D. Oklahoma, 2004)
Anderson v. Ayling
297 F. Supp. 2d 805 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2003)
Alden v. Allied Adult & Child Clinic, L.L.C.
171 F. Supp. 2d 647 (E.D. Louisiana, 2001)
Livingston Downs Racing Ass'n v. Jefferson Downs Corp.
192 F. Supp. 2d 519 (M.D. Louisiana, 2001)
St. Paul Mercury Insurance v. Williamson
224 F.3d 425 (Fifth Circuit, 2000)
Khurana v. Innov Hlth Care
164 F.3d 900 (Fifth Circuit, 1999)
Khurana v. Innovative Health Care Systems, Inc.
164 F.3d 900 (Fifth Circuit, 1999)