Khurana v. Innov Hlth Care
This text of 164 F.3d 900 (Khurana v. Innov Hlth Care) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
164 F.3d 900
Rajiv KHURANA, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
INNOVATIVE HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS, INC.; Karry Teel; Carl
Holden; William Malone; I.H.S. River Region
Hospital of Vacherie, La., Inc.,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 96-30525.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
Jan. 11, 1999.
James Alan Williams, McElwee, Williams & Peters, L.L.C., Gretna, LA, Robert Elton Arceneaux, Barham & Arceneaux, New Orleans, LA, for Khurana.
Frank E. Massengale, Karen Kaler Whitfield, Massengale & Debruhl, New Orleans, LA, for Defendants-Appellees.
Frank H. Walk, Jr., New Orleans, LA, pro se.
Edward P. Gothard, Metairie, LA, pro se.
Frederick M. Stoller, McCloskey, Langenstein & Stoller, New Orleans, LA, pro se.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana; A.J. McNamara, Judge.
Before WIENER and PARKER, Circuit Judges, and LITTLE,* Chief District Judge.
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
PER CURIAM:
In accordance with the Order of the Supreme Court of the United States, this case is dismissed as moot. See Teel v. Khurana, --- U.S. ----, 119 S.Ct. 442, 142 L.Ed.2d 442 (1998).
DISMISSED AS MOOT.
Chief Judge of the Western District of Louisiana, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
164 F.3d 900, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/khurana-v-innov-hlth-care-ca5-1999.