Khurana v. Innov Hlth Care

164 F.3d 900
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided January 12, 1999·No. 96-30525·Published

Opinion

164 F.3d 900

Rajiv KHURANA, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
INNOVATIVE HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS, INC.; Karry Teel; Carl
Holden; William Malone; I.H.S. River Region
Hospital of Vacherie, La., Inc.,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 96-30525.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 11, 1999.

James Alan Williams, McElwee, Williams & Peters, L.L.C., Gretna, LA, Robert Elton Arceneaux, Barham & Arceneaux, New Orleans, LA, for Khurana.

Frank E. Massengale, Karen Kaler Whitfield, Massengale & Debruhl, New Orleans, LA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Frank H. Walk, Jr., New Orleans, LA, pro se.

Edward P. Gothard, Metairie, LA, pro se.

Frederick M. Stoller, McCloskey, Langenstein & Stoller, New Orleans, LA, pro se.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana; A.J. McNamara, Judge.

Before WIENER and PARKER, Circuit Judges, and LITTLE,* Chief District Judge.

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

PER CURIAM:

In accordance with the Order of the Supreme Court of the United States, this case is dismissed as moot. See Teel v. Khurana, --- U.S. ----, 119 S.Ct. 442, 142 L.Ed.2d 442 (1998).

DISMISSED AS MOOT.

*

Chief Judge of the Western District of Louisiana, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Khurana v. Innov Hlth Care, 164 F.3d 900 (5th Cir. 1999).

164 F.3d 900 (Khurana v. Innov Hlth Care) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Teel v. Khurana
525 U.S. 979 (Supreme Court, 1998)