Teegarden v. Teegarden

74 N.E.2d 859, 80 Ohio App. 78, 48 Ohio Law. Abs. 383, 35 Ohio Op. 447, 1947 Ohio App. LEXIS 684

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Teegarden v. Teegarden. Read the opinion of the Court — 83 Ohio App. 517 →

Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided March 26, 1947·No. 138·Published

Opinion

By the Court.

This cause is submitted on motion of appellant to amend the notice of appeal to read,

4 ‘ said appeal is on questions of law and fact, ’ ’ instead of reading, “upon questions of law, only.”

The action is one for divorce, which is a statutory proceeding in which an appeal on questions of law and fact may not be taken. Furthermore, no appeal bond having been filed as required by Section 12223-6, General Code, an appeal on questions of law'and fact-cannot be maintained. The motion to amend is overruled.

Motion overruled.

Wiseman, P. J., Miller and Hornbeck, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

This cause is submitted on motion of appellant to amend the notice of appeal to read,

4 ‘ said appeal is on questions of law and fact, ’ ’ instead of reading, “upon questions of law, only.”

Motion overruled.

Wiseman, P. J., Miller and Hornbeck, JJ., concur.

Teegarden v. Teegarden, 74 N.E.2d 859, 80 Ohio App. 78, 48 Ohio Law. Abs. 383, 35 Ohio Op. 447, 1947 Ohio App. LEXIS 684 (Ohio Ct. App. 1947).

Pincite

74 N.E.2d 859 (Teegarden v. Teegarden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.