Teegarden v. Teegarden

Ohio Court of Appeals

Teegarden v. Teegarden

74 N.E.2d 859, 80 Ohio App. 78, 48 Ohio Law. Abs. 383, 35 Ohio Op. 447, 1947 Ohio App. LEXIS 684

CourtOhio Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 26, 1947

Docket138

StatusPublished

This text of 74 N.E.2d 859 (Teegarden v. Teegarden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Teegarden v. Teegarden, 74 N.E.2d 859, 80 Ohio App. 78, 48 Ohio Law. Abs. 383, 35 Ohio Op. 447, 1947 Ohio App. LEXIS 684 (Ohio Ct. App. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

This cause is submitted on motion of appellant to amend the notice of appeal to read,

4 ‘ said appeal is on questions of law and fact, ’ ’ instead of reading, “upon questions of law, only.”

The action is one for divorce, which is a statutory proceeding in which an appeal on questions of law and fact may not be taken. Furthermore, no appeal bond having been filed as required by Section 12223-6, General Code, an appeal on questions of law'and fact-cannot be maintained. The motion to amend is overruled.

Motion overruled.

Wiseman, P. J., Miller and Hornbeck, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI