TECLEZGHI v. Holder
This text of 628 F.3d 1055 (TECLEZGHI v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Order; Dissent by Judge PREGERSON.
[1056]*1056ORDER
Judges Kleinfeld and Duffy voted to deny the petition for rehearing. Judge Fletcher voted to grant the petition for rehearing. Judges Kleinfeld and Duffy recommend denying the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Fletcher recommends granting the petition for rehearing en banc.
The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and a judge of the court requested a vote on whether to rehear the case en banc. ■ The en banc call failed to receive a majority of votes by active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35.
The petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
628 F.3d 1055, 2010 WL 5483375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/teclezghi-v-holder-ca9-2010.