Technitrol, Inc. v. NCR Corp.

Seventh Circuit

Technitrol, Inc. v. NCR Corp.

513 F.2d 1130

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

DecidedApril 18, 1975

DocketNos. 74-1904, 74-1905

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 513 F.2d 1130 (Technitrol, Inc. v. NCR Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Technitrol, Inc. v. NCR Corp., 513 F.2d 1130 (7th Cir. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff Technitrol, Inc. appeals from an order granting summary judgment, based upon laches, in favor of the defendant NCR Corporation. Defendant NCR Corporation cross-appeals from the same order, arguing that it should have been awarded attorney fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285. Although the District Court did not finally adjudicate the claims against another defendant, the order is appealable because it included a determination and direction for the entry of judgment as to NCR pursuant to Rule 54(b), Fed.R.Civ.P. We affirm the judgment of the District Court in all respects and adopt Parts I through IV of the memorandum opinion and order of that court, Technitrol, Inc. v. Memorex Corp., 376 F.Supp. 828 (N.D.Ill.1974), as the opinion of this court.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff Technitrol, Inc. appeals from an order granting summary judgment, based upon laches, in favor of the defendant NCR Corporation. Defendant NCR Corporation cross-appeals from the same order, arguing that it should have been awarded attorney fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285. Although the District Court did not finally adjudicate the claims against another defendant, the order is appealable because it included a determination and direction for the entry of judgment as to NCR pursuant to Rule 54(b), Fed.R.Civ.P. We affirm the judgment of the District Court in all respects and adopt Parts I through IV of the memorandum opinion and order of that court, Technitrol, Inc. v. Memorex Corp., 376 F.Supp. 828 (N.D.Ill.1974), as the opinion of this court.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

513 F.2d 1130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/technitrol-inc-v-ncr-corp-ca7-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack