Technitrol, Inc. v. NCR Corp.

513 F.2d 1130
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided April 18, 1975·No. Nos. 74-1904, 74-1905·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff Technitrol, Inc. appeals from an order granting summary judgment, based upon laches, in favor of the defendant NCR Corporation. Defendant NCR Corporation cross-appeals from the same order, arguing that it should have been awarded attorney fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285. Although the District Court did not finally adjudicate the claims against another defendant, the order is appealable because it included a determination and direction for the entry of judgment as to NCR pursuant to Rule 54(b), Fed.R.Civ.P. We affirm the judgment of the District Court in all respects and adopt Parts I through IV of the memorandum opinion and order of that court, Technitrol, Inc. v. Memorex Corp., 376 F.Supp. 828 (N.D.Ill.1974), as the opinion of this court.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Technitrol, Inc. v. NCR Corp., 513 F.2d 1130 (7th Cir. 1975).

513 F.2d 1130 (Technitrol, Inc. v. NCR Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.
960 F.2d 1020 (Federal Circuit, 1992)
Motorola, Inc. v. CBS, INC.
672 F. Supp. 1033 (N.D. Illinois, 1986)
A.C. Aukerman Co. v. Miller Formless Co., Inc.
693 F.2d 697 (Seventh Circuit, 1982)