Technical Consumer Products v. Lighting Science Group Corp.
This text of Technical Consumer Products v. Lighting Science Group Corp. (Technical Consumer Products v. Lighting Science Group Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 19-1360 Document: 64 Page: 1 Filed: 03/16/2020
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
TECHNICAL CONSUMER PRODUCTS, INC., NICOR, INC., AMAX LIGHTING, Appellants
v.
LIGHTING SCIENCE GROUP CORPORATION, Appellee ______________________
2019-1360 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2017- 01280, IPR2018-00261, IPR2018-00271. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
STACIE RACHEL HARTMAN, Steptoe & Johnson LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for appellants. Also represented by JOHN LLOYD ABRAMIC, KATHERINE H. JOHNSON.
KAYVAN B. NOROOZI, Noroozi PC, Los Angeles, CA, ar- gued for appellee. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is Case: 19-1360 Document: 64 Page: 2 Filed: 03/16/2020
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (DYK, CHEN, and STOLL, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
March 16, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Technical Consumer Products v. Lighting Science Group Corp., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/technical-consumer-products-v-lighting-science-group-corp-cafc-2020.