Teamsters Local Union No. 523 v. National Labor Relations Board

624 F.3d 1321, 193 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3091, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 22662
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedOctober 29, 2010
DocketNos. 08-9568, 08-9577
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 624 F.3d 1321 (Teamsters Local Union No. 523 v. National Labor Relations Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Teamsters Local Union No. 523 v. National Labor Relations Board, 624 F.3d 1321, 193 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3091, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 22662 (10th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

OPINION ON REMAND FROM THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT

TACHA, Circuit Judge.

On remand from the United States Supreme Court’s opinion in Teamsters Local Union Number 523 v. N.L.R.B., — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 109, - L.Ed.2d -, 2010 WL 1990005 (2010), we hold that the two-member NLRB group that issued the order in this case lacked statutory authority to act. New Process Steel, L.P. v. N.L.R.B., — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 2635, 2640, 177 L.Ed.2d 162 (2010). Therefore, we VACATE the Board’s order and REMAND to the Board for further proceedings. We GRANT Respondent/Cross-Petitioner’s motion for remand.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
624 F.3d 1321, 193 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3091, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 22662, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/teamsters-local-union-no-523-v-national-labor-relations-board-ca10-2010.