Teamsters for a Democratic Union v. Secretary, Department of Labor

D.C. Circuit

Teamsters for a Democratic Union v. Secretary, Department of Labor

810 F.2d 301, 258 U.S. App. D.C. 182, 124 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2648, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 1734

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedFebruary 6, 1987

Docket86-5225

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 810 F.2d 301 (Teamsters for a Democratic Union v. Secretary, Department of Labor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Teamsters for a Democratic Union v. Secretary, Department of Labor, 810 F.2d 301, 258 U.S. App. D.C. 182, 124 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2648, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 1734 (D.C. Cir. 1987).

Pincite

Opinions

Opinion for the Court PER CURIAM.

Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge HARRY T. EDWARDS.

PER CURIAM:

We affirm the judgment of the District Court, see Teamsters for a Democratic Union v. Secretary of Labor, 629 F.Supp. 665 (D.D.C.1986), for the reasons stated in the court’s opinion. As the District Court found, the appellants are essentially challenging delegate eligibility requirements for national conventions to elect union officers under Title IV of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959 (the “Act”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 481-483 (1982). Accordingly, the appellants are limited to the post-election remedies provided in section 402 of the Act, 29 U.S.C. § 482 (1982).

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion for the Court PER CURIAM.

Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge HARRY T. EDWARDS.

PER CURIAM:

We affirm the judgment of the District Court, see Teamsters for a Democratic Union v. Secretary of Labor, 629 F.Supp. 665 (D.D.C.1986), for the reasons stated in the court’s opinion. As the District Court found, the appellants are essentially challenging delegate eligibility requirements for national conventions to elect union officers under Title IV of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959 (the “Act”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 481-483 (1982). Accordingly, the appellants are limited to the post-election remedies provided in section 402 of the Act, 29 U.S.C. § 482 (1982).

So ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

810 F.2d 301, 258 U.S. App. D.C. 182, 124 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2648, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 1734, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/teamsters-for-a-democratic-union-v-secretary-department-of-labor-cadc-1987.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack