Teague v. NCDOT

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1385

JOE E. TEAGUE, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

NCDOT,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:07-cv-00045-F)

Submitted: November 30, 2010 Decided: December 3, 2010

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joe E. Teague, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Ebony Jeanelle Pittman, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Joe Edwards Teague, Jr., appeals the district court’s

orders denying relief on his motion seeking to re-open the

appeal period in the underlying civil action. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. Teague v. NCDOT,

No. 5:07-cv-00045-F (E.D.N.C. Dec. 29, 2009; Mar. 8, 2010). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED