Teague v. NCDOT

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 3, 2010
Docket10-1385
StatusUnpublished

This text of Teague v. NCDOT (Teague v. NCDOT) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Teague v. NCDOT, (4th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1385

JOE E. TEAGUE, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

NCDOT,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:07-cv-00045-F)

Submitted: November 30, 2010 Decided: December 3, 2010

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joe E. Teague, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Ebony Jeanelle Pittman, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Joe Edwards Teague, Jr., appeals the district court’s

orders denying relief on his motion seeking to re-open the

appeal period in the underlying civil action. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. Teague v. NCDOT,

No. 5:07-cv-00045-F (E.D.N.C. Dec. 29, 2009; Mar. 8, 2010). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Teague v. NCDOT, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/teague-v-ncdot-ca4-2010.