Teague v. City of Omaha
This text of 320 N.W.2d 779 (Teague v. City of Omaha) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The instant appeal from the Nebraska Workmen’s Compensation Court involves the issue as to whether payment by the City of Omaha of disability pension benefits under an unenforceable ordinance in lieu of workmen’s compensation benefits estops the City from asserting the statute of limitations as a defense. Our opinion in Kohlbeck v. City of Omaha, ante p. 372, 318 N.W.2d 742 (1982), is dispositive of the issue. Such payments did not toll the period of limitations and the City of Omaha is not estopped from asserting the period of limitations as a defense. The award of the Nebraska Workmen’s Compensation Court is reversed and the action dismissed.
Reversed and dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
320 N.W.2d 779, 211 Neb. 872, 1982 Neb. LEXIS 1141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/teague-v-city-of-omaha-neb-1982.