Baker v. City of Omaha

Nebraska Supreme Court

Baker v. City of Omaha

324 N.W.2d 265, 212 Neb. 583, 1982 Neb. LEXIS 1254

Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided September 17, 1982·No. No. 82-271·Published

Opinion

Krivosha, C.J.

This matter comes to the court following an award entered by a three-judge Workmen’s Compensation [584]*584Court on rehearing. The single issue presented to us is whether the statute of limitations in the matter has run, thereby barring Baker’s right to commence this action. We believe that our decisions in Kohlbeck v. City of Omaha, 211 Neb. 372, 318 N.W.2d 742 (1982), and Teague v. City of Omaha, 211 Neb. 872, 320 N.W.2d 779 (1982), are controlling.

Accordingly, we believe that the award entered by the three-judge court must be reversed and the petition dismissed. The judgment is therefore reversed and the petition dismissed.

Reversed and dismissed.

Clinton, J., participating on briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Krivosha, C.J.

This matter comes to the court following an award entered by a three-judge Workmen’s Compensation [584]*584Court on rehearing. The single issue presented to us is whether the statute of limitations in the matter has run, thereby barring Baker’s right to commence this action. We believe that our decisions in Kohlbeck v. City of Omaha, 211 Neb. 372, 318 N.W.2d 742 (1982), and Teague v. City of Omaha, 211 Neb. 872, 320 N.W.2d 779 (1982), are controlling.

Accordingly, we believe that the award entered by the three-judge court must be reversed and the petition dismissed. The judgment is therefore reversed and the petition dismissed.

Reversed and dismissed.

Clinton, J., participating on briefs.

Baker v. City of Omaha, 324 N.W.2d 265, 212 Neb. 583, 1982 Neb. LEXIS 1254 (Neb. 1982).

Pincite

324 N.W.2d 265 (Baker v. City of Omaha) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related