Baker v. City of Omaha

Nebraska Supreme Court

Baker v. City of Omaha

324 N.W.2d 265, 212 Neb. 583, 1982 Neb. LEXIS 1254

CourtNebraska Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 17, 1982

DocketNo. 82-271

StatusPublished

This text of 324 N.W.2d 265 (Baker v. City of Omaha) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baker v. City of Omaha, 324 N.W.2d 265, 212 Neb. 583, 1982 Neb. LEXIS 1254 (Neb. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

Krivosha, C.J.

This matter comes to the court following an award entered by a three-judge Workmen’s Compensation [584]*584Court on rehearing. The single issue presented to us is whether the statute of limitations in the matter has run, thereby barring Baker’s right to commence this action. We believe that our decisions in Kohlbeck v. City of Omaha, 211 Neb. 372, 318 N.W.2d 742 (1982), and Teague v. City of Omaha, 211 Neb. 872, 320 N.W.2d 779 (1982), are controlling.

Accordingly, we believe that the award entered by the three-judge court must be reversed and the petition dismissed. The judgment is therefore reversed and the petition dismissed.

Reversed and dismissed.

Clinton, J., participating on briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI