Taylor v. Wallesen

Nebraska Supreme Court

Taylor v. Wallesen

384 N.W.2d 270, 222 Neb. 411, 1986 Neb. LEXIS 917

CourtNebraska Supreme Court

DecidedApril 4, 1986

Docket84-771

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 384 N.W.2d 270 (Taylor v. Wallesen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Taylor v. Wallesen, 384 N.W.2d 270, 222 Neb. 411, 1986 Neb. LEXIS 917 (Neb. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

Hastings, J.

Defendant Kirk A. Wallesen has appealed a jury verdict of $9,000 in favor of the plaintiff, which was returned following the court’s instruction in favor of the plaintiff on the issue of liability.

Eight separate errors are detailed in defendant’s brief. However, the resolution of each necessitates a bill of *412 exceptions. None has been filed with this court. The responsibility for filing such bill of exceptions in the Supreme Court rests upon the appellant. Neb. Ct. R. 5C(5) (rev. 1983).

When, on appeal, this court is asked to review errors which require a consideration of the evidence, we cannot give them consideration in the absence of a bill of exceptions. Lanc v. Douglas County Welfare Administration, 189 Neb. 651, 204 N.W.2d 387 (1973). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI