Bestmann v. Vitek

Nebraska Supreme Court

Bestmann v. Vitek

393 N.W.2d 530, 223 Neb. 758, 1986 Neb. LEXIS 1070

CourtNebraska Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 26, 1986

DocketNo. 85-578

StatusPublished

This text of 393 N.W.2d 530 (Bestmann v. Vitek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bestmann v. Vitek, 393 N.W.2d 530, 223 Neb. 758, 1986 Neb. LEXIS 1070 (Neb. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

Hastings, J.

Petitioner, Allen Bestmann, has appealed the order of the district court which denied his application for a writ of habeas corpus.

In his appeal Bestmann charges that there was a lack of sufficient minimum contact by him with the State of Minnesota, the demanding state, to constitute his actions a violation of the criminal law of that state and that the [759]*759extradition documents on their face were insufficient to support the issuance of a warrant of extradition.

However, the errors claimed by Bestmann require an examination of the bill of exceptions. No such bill has been filed with this court, and we therefore are unable to give consideration to the errors assigned. Taylor v. Wallesen, 222 Neb. 411, 384 N.W.2d 270 (1986).

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI