Taylor v. Virginia

642 F. App'x 205
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 22, 2016
DocketNo. 15-2350
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 642 F. App'x 205 (Taylor v. Virginia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Taylor v. Virginia, 642 F. App'x 205 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Eric Emanuel Taylor appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint without prejudice and imposing an expanded system of prefiling review on his future filings. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Taylor v. Virginia, No. 2:15-cv-00429-AWA-RJK (E.D.Va. Oct. 27, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

AIKEN v. United States
D. New Jersey, 2021

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
642 F. App'x 205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-virginia-ca4-2016.