Taylor v. Supreme Court of the United States

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedJune 6, 2019
DocketCivil Action No. 2019-1346
StatusPublished

This text of Taylor v. Supreme Court of the United States (Taylor v. Supreme Court of the United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Taylor v. Supreme Court of the United States, (D.D.C. 2019).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

ERIC EMANUEL TAYLOR, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 19-1346 (UNA) ) SUPREME COURT OF THE ) UNITED STATES, et al., ) ) Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Due to the plaintiff’s a history of filing numerous meritless claims, the United States

District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia issued a Pre-Filing Review and Dismissal

Order. See Taylor v. Virginia, No. 2:15cv429 (E.D. Va. Oct. 27, 2015), aff’d, 642 F. App’x 205

(4th Cir. 2016) (per curiam) (affirming district court’s order dismissing his complaint without

prejudice and imposing an expanded system of prefiling review on his future filings), cert.

dismissed, 136 S. Ct. 2394 (2016). The plaintiff challenges the Eastern District of Virginia’s

refusal to file a complaint he submitted in February 2019 pursuant to its Pre-Filing Review and

Dismissal Order, asserting that the court violated his rights under the First Amendment to the

United States Constitution.

The plaintiff’s complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. This

federal district court “can neither review the decisions of its sister court nor compel it to act.”

Ortiz v. Pratter, No. 1:15-CV-00481, 2015 WL 1546252, at *1 (D.D.C. Apr. 3, 2015); see Mullis

v. U.S. Bankr. Court for Dist. of Nevada, 828 F.2d 1385, 1393 (9th Cir. 1987) (citing Lewis v.

Green, 629 F. Supp. 546, 553 (D.D.C. 1986)); El Bey v. United States, No. 1:16-CV-00164, 2016

WL 9943453, at *1 (D.D.C. Feb. 2, 2016), aff’d, 697 F. App’x 706 (D.C. Cir. 2017); Thomas v. Wilkins, 61 F. Supp. 3d 13, 20 (D.D.C. 2014), aff’d, No. 14-5197, 2015 WL 1606933 (D.C. Cir.

Feb. 23, 2015); see also Fleming v. United States, 847 F. Supp. 170, 172 (D.D.C. 1994), aff’d,

No. 94-5079, 1994 WL 474995, at *1 (D.C. Cir. July 27, 1994) (per curiam), cert. denied, 513

U.S. 1150 (1995).

Accordingly, the Court will grant plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis,

and dismiss the complaint. An Order is issued separately.

DATE: May 22, 2019 /s/ COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fleming v. United States
847 F. Supp. 170 (District of Columbia, 1994)
Lewis v. Green
629 F. Supp. 546 (District of Columbia, 1986)
Thomas v. Wilkins
61 F. Supp. 3d 13 (District of Columbia, 2014)
Taylor v. Virginia
642 F. App'x 205 (Fourth Circuit, 2016)
El Bey v. United States
697 F. App'x 706 (D.C. Circuit, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Taylor v. Supreme Court of the United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-supreme-court-of-the-united-states-dcd-2019.