Taylor v. State
This text of 55 S.W.3d 584 (Taylor v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
OPINION
delivered the opinion of the Court
The State charged appellant with possession of cocaine and possession of methamphetamine. Appellant filed a motion to suppress the evidence seized from the home. The trial court denied the motion, concluding that appellant had no standing to object to the search because he had no reasonable expectation of privacy in his friend’s residence. Appellant was convicted of the offenses. The Court of Appeals affirmed. We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review.
Having examined the record and briefs and considered the arguments in the case, we have reached the conclusion that our decision to grant review was improvident. We therefore dismiss the appellant’s petition as improvidently granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
55 S.W.3d 584, 2001 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 63, 2001 WL 1042734, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-state-texcrimapp-2001.