Taylor v. State

55 S.W.3d 584, 2001 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 63, 2001 WL 1042734
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided September 12, 2001·No. Nos. 1194-99, 1195-99·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinions

OPINION

KELLER, P.J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court

in which KEASLER, HERVEY, and HOLCOMB, J.J., joined.

The State charged appellant with possession of cocaine and possession of methamphetamine. Appellant filed a motion to suppress the evidence seized from the home. The trial court denied the motion, concluding that appellant had no standing to object to the search because he had no reasonable expectation of privacy in his friend’s residence. Appellant was convicted of the offenses. The Court of Appeals affirmed. We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review.

Having examined the record and briefs and considered the arguments in the case, we have reached the conclusion that our decision to grant review was improvident. We therefore dismiss the appellant’s petition as improvidently granted.

JOHNSON, J., filed a concurring opinion. WOMACK, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which MEYERS and PRICE, JJ., joined.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor v. State, 55 S.W.3d 584, 2001 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 63, 2001 WL 1042734 (Tex. 2001).

55 S.W.3d 584 (Taylor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams, George Riley Jr.
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2015
State v. Lakendrick Markesse Rogers
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2012
Eddie Wilson v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2010
Salazar, Jennifer Renee v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2004
Steven L. Richey v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003
Chia-Ochoa, Luis Alberto v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003
Lacedric Dramel Wilcott v. State of Texas
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2002