Taylor v. State
This text of 1924 OK CR 81 (Taylor v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff in error, Curtis Taylor, was convicted in the county court of Canadian county of the offense of unlawfully conveying intoxicating liquor, and punishment fixed at imprisonment in the county jail for a period of three months and to pay a fine of $250. Judgment was rendered on the 23d day of November, 1922. This is an appeal by transcript of the record.
This cause was finally submitted on the 28th day of February, 1924. No brief has been filed in behalf of plaintiff in error, and no appearance was made to orally argue the cause at the time it was submitted.
Rule 9 of this court provides:
“When no counsel appears, and no briefs are filed, the court will examine the pleadings, the instructions of the court and the exceptions taken thereto, and the judgment and sentence, amj, if no prejudicial error appears, will affirm the judgment. ’ ’
*338 After an examination of the pleadings, the instructions of the court, and the judgment and sentence, the court finds that no prejudicial error occurred sufficient to authorize a reversal of this judgment, and the same is therefore affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1924 OK CR 81, 223 P. 889, 26 Okla. Crim. 337, 1924 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 72, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-state-oklacrimapp-1924.