Taylor v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Taylor v. State

738 S.E.2d 347, 321 Ga. App. 736, 2013 Fulton County D. Rep. 304, 2013 WL 541078, 2013 Ga. App. LEXIS 65

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 14, 2013

DocketA13A0522

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 738 S.E.2d 347 (Taylor v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Taylor v. State, 738 S.E.2d 347, 321 Ga. App. 736, 2013 Fulton County D. Rep. 304, 2013 WL 541078, 2013 Ga. App. LEXIS 65 (Ga. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

DOYLE, Presiding Judge.

Harry Brett Taylor filed a direct appeal from the trial court’s denial of his pre-trial plea in bar based upon an alleged violation of his constitutional right to a speedy trial. The Supreme Court of Georgia has ruled, however, that such a claim is not directly appealable and that a defendant must follow the interlocutory appeal procedures of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b).¹ Taylor’s appeal is therefore dismissed.²

Appeal dismissed.

McFadden and Boggs, JJ., concur. [737]*737Decided February 14, 2013 Reconsideration denied May 10, 2013 Chandler, Britt, Jay & Beck, Walter M. Britt, for appellant. Daniel J. Porter, District Attorney, Wesley C. Ross, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DOYLE, Presiding Judge.

Harry Brett Taylor filed a direct appeal from the trial court’s denial of his pre-trial plea in bar based upon an alleged violation of his constitutional right to a speedy trial. The Supreme Court of Georgia has ruled, however, that such a claim is not directly appealable and that a defendant must follow the interlocutory appeal procedures of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b).¹ Taylor’s appeal is therefore dismissed.²

Appeal dismissed.

McFadden and Boggs, JJ., concur. [737]*737Decided February 14, 2013 Reconsideration denied May 10, 2013 Chandler, Britt, Jay & Beck, Walter M. Britt, for appellant. Daniel J. Porter, District Attorney, Wesley C. Ross, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

738 S.E.2d 347, 321 Ga. App. 736, 2013 Fulton County D. Rep. 304, 2013 WL 541078, 2013 Ga. App. LEXIS 65, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-state-gactapp-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack